Open source software is responsible for many of the technological world, including the Linux operating system and Mozilla Firefox, to name just a few. Nowadays, open source software is increasingly regarded by companies as valuable.
Open source software allows full collaboration. As these types of software allow anyone to embarrass, analyze and change the source code of any information technology, anyone can market their own version for sales and profit. The ability of such freedom to manipulate source code is what allowed many companies to constantly improve their products, a move that is vital if the market is to compete. But, like all, the open source has two sides, positive and negative.
Users of widely used technology, free download and use of software are a great plus. Open source software developers do not feel the same profit pressure as those with larger companies. Therefore, developments in the Code can focus more on what each user needs and less to prepare for the mass market.
Developers benefit from spending more time on developing existing software. This can be a much smaller risk of errors, as it may take some time to resolve the issue before the software is released, instead of changing the change quickly before stability.
Open source software can be installed on many sites for many instances without tracking or monitoring, as is generally the case with licensed software. This is a definite advantage for companies.
And this type of software can continue to exist even if the creation company is unsuccessful, as it may become part of the user and the developer community to manipulate it as it sees fit.
Competition is clearly open source. As everyone has access to the code, including developers, competing products can easily be created. Also, as the code is public, developers may be making mistakes, which means that the developer's reputation can get stuck quickly.
In some cases, open-source software may require a user's specific operating experience. A good example is the Linux operating system, which requires much more navigation menus and configuration options. A non-knowledgeable user will also find no help in the documentation of the software, which may be uncertain if it exists at all.
And although it is highly recommended, it does not necessarily mean that open source is completely free development or use. There may be situations that may require paid administration and support costs.
Ultimately, the end user will judge the usefulness of free technology. Therefore, all the problems and disadvantages must be made when we try to make a decision about the transition to the open source.